Harold Garfinkel

Click here to join our telegram community

Table of Contents

Biographical Background: Harold Garfinkel

Harold Garfinkel, a prominent sociologist known for his groundbreaking work in ethnomethodology, made significant contributions to the fields of sociology, social psychology, and symbolic interactionism. Born on October 29, 1917, in Newark, New Jersey, Garfinkel’s ideas have had a profound impact on our understanding of social order, meaning-making, and everyday social interaction.

Harold Garfinkel grew up in New Jersey and attended the University of Newark, where he initially studied accounting before switching to sociology. He later pursued graduate studies at Harvard University, where he worked with renowned sociologists such as Talcott Parsons and George C. Homans. Garfinkel’s early research focused on socialization and social order, but he became increasingly interested in the micro-level processes of social interaction. In the 1950s, he began developing his ideas about ethnomethodology, which would become the hallmark of his work.

Key Concepts and Contributions:

1. Ethnomethodology:

Harold Garfinkel is best known for developing the theory and methodology of ethnomethodology, which seeks to uncover the taken-for-granted methods and practices through which individuals construct social reality. Ethnomethodology challenges traditional sociological approaches by focusing on the “ordinary” or “everyday” aspects of social life that are often overlooked or taken for granted. Garfinkel argued that individuals actively engage in sense-making activities to maintain social order and coordination in their interactions.

2. Breaching Experiments:

A central methodological tool in ethnomethodology is the breaching experiment, in which researchers intentionally violate social norms or expectations to reveal the underlying rules and assumptions guiding social behavior. Garfinkel conducted numerous breaching experiments to demonstrate how seemingly mundane interactions are structured by implicit rules and expectations. For example, he instructed his students to engage in “unusual” behaviors, such as speaking in nonsensical sentences or staring at strangers, to observe the reactions of others and the resulting disruptions to social order.

3. Indexicality and Reflexivity:

Ethnomethodology emphasizes the indexical nature of social meaning, highlighting how meanings are contextually situated and contingent upon specific social contexts. Garfinkel argued that individuals use “indexical expressions,” such as gestures, tones of voice, and contextual cues, to make sense of their interactions and coordinate their actions with others. Ethnomethodology also emphasizes reflexivity, or the process of individuals reflecting on and making sense of their own social actions and the actions of others.

4. Accounts and Accountability:

Another key concept in ethnomethodology is the idea of “accounts” and “accountability,” which refers to the ways in which individuals provide explanations or justifications for their actions in social interactions. Garfinkel argued that individuals use “accounts” to make sense of their behavior and maintain social order, even in the face of disruptions or breaches. Ethnomethodologists analyze how individuals navigate social situations by providing “accounts” that are intelligible and acceptable within the given context.

Conclusion:

Harold Garfinkel’s ideas have had a lasting impact on the fields of sociology, social psychology, and communication studies. His development of ethnomethodology challenged conventional sociological paradigms and paved the way for new approaches to understanding social interaction. Garfinkel’s emphasis on the practical and situated nature of social order has inspired scholars to reexamine taken-for-granted assumptions about social reality and to explore the complexities of everyday life.

Harold Garfinkel’s contributions to sociology and social theory have reshaped our understanding of social order, meaning-making, and the dynamics of everyday interaction. His development of ethnomethodology has provided researchers with a powerful framework for studying the social construction of reality and the methods through which individuals navigate their social worlds. Garfinkel’s legacy as a pioneering thinker underscores the importance of attending to the ordinary and the mundane in our efforts to understand the complexities of human social life.