Click here to join telegram group
Karl Marx, in his analysis of class struggle and historical materialism, makes a crucial distinction between “class-in-itself” (Klasse an sich) and “class-for-itself” (Klasse für sich). These concepts are essential to understanding the revolutionary potential of the proletariat (working class) in capitalist society.
1. Class-in-itself (Klasse an sich):
This refers to a group of people who share common material conditions, especially their relation to the means of production, but who are not yet conscious of their common interests as a class.
- In a capitalist society, the proletariat constitutes a class-in-itself because:
- They do not own the means of production.
- They sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie (capitalist class).
- They experience similar exploitation, such as alienation, wage suppression, and insecure working conditions.
Example:
Factory workers across industries may face poor wages and long hours but initially may not realize they share a collective identity or interests. They compete with each other in the labor market and lack organized resistance. Hence, they remain a class-in-itself.
2. Class-for-itself (Klasse für sich):
This stage is reached when a class develops class consciousness — i.e., it becomes aware of its common interests, identity, and opposition to the ruling class — and begins to act in its own collective interest.
- The proletariat becomes a class-for-itself when:
- Workers recognize their shared exploitation.
- They develop solidarity.
- They organize through trade unions, political parties, or revolutionary movements.
- They act to overthrow capitalist structures and establish a classless society.
Example:
When industrial workers form unions, protest against capitalist policies, or support a socialist revolution, they are transitioning into a class-for-itself.
3. Dialectical Progression and Revolutionary Potential:
Marx believed that history moves through class conflict, and the proletariat, once it becomes a class-for-itself, would become the agent of revolutionary change.
- The alienation under capitalism and the contradictions between capital and labor would intensify.
- This would push workers toward political awakening.
- Ultimately, a proletarian revolution would abolish the class system and lead to communism, where there are no exploiters or exploited.
4. Why This Distinction Matters in Marxist Theory:
- It shows that economic position alone is not enough for revolutionary change.
- Consciousness and collective political action are necessary.
- It emphasizes that the subjective awareness of class is as important as the objective economic conditions.
Conclusion:
In sum, for Karl Marx, the proletariat exists initially as a class-in-itself, defined by its exploitation in the capitalist mode of production. However, through growing awareness and struggle, it can evolve into a class-for-itself, capable of challenging and eventually overthrowing the bourgeois order. This transformation is central to Marx’s vision of historical progress and the eventual realization of a classless, communist society.
Click here to join telegram group