Click here to join telegram group
Land has historically been the primary source of livelihood, power, and status in Indian society. The ownership and control of land define the structure of agrarian relations. However, in recent decades, there has been a steady transfer of land from cultivating to non-cultivating classes—such as urban elites, absentee landlords, and corporate investors—causing major socio-economic and cultural transformations in rural India.
1. Nature of the Transformation
- Traditionally, land was owned and cultivated by peasant families, forming the basis of agrarian social structure.
- Due to processes like urbanization, industrialization, and commercialization of agriculture, land is increasingly being acquired by non-cultivating groups—businessmen, bureaucrats, politicians, and real-estate developers.
This shift marks a movement from agrarian economy to capitalist and market-oriented relations.
2. Economic Transformation
- Commercialization of land: Land becomes an economic asset rather than a means of livelihood.
- Corporate and contract farming: Companies lease land from peasants for commercial crops, displacing small cultivators.
- Urban expansion: Farmlands on city outskirts are purchased by urban investors, leading to real estate speculation.
- Example: Expansion around cities like Gurugram, Hyderabad, and Bengaluru, where farmland was sold to developers.
This reflects the rise of agrarian capitalism and decline of the peasant mode of production.
3. Social Transformation
- Decline of the peasantry: The traditional peasant class loses its economic base and migrates to urban areas for wage labor.
- Emergence of new rural elites: Non-cultivating owners or absentee landlords exercise economic and political dominance in villages without engaging in cultivation.
- Erosion of traditional caste hierarchy: Former dominant cultivating castes (like Jats, Reddys, and Patidars) invest in business or urban enterprises, diluting caste-based agrarian ties.
Sociologists like Andre Béteille and A. R. Desai note that these changes have redefined class and caste relations in rural India.
4. Cultural and Political Transformation
- Shift in value orientation: Rural youth aspire for urban jobs rather than agricultural occupations.
- Land as speculative capital: Land ownership confers prestige but not necessarily agricultural engagement.
- New patterns of political power: Land-rich non-cultivators influence panchayat politics and local governance despite detachment from farming.
5. Illustrations
- Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in states like Maharashtra and Gujarat have transferred thousands of acres from peasants to industrialists.
- Real estate boom around metropolitan peripheries (e.g., NCR, Hyderabad) displaced cultivators and created neo-rural elites.
- Contract farming in Punjab and Haryana introduced corporate involvement in land previously owned and cultivated by farmers.
Conclusion
The transfer of land from cultivating to non-cultivating owners represents a structural transformation in Indian society—from agrarian-based social relations to market- and capital-based systems.
It has weakened traditional caste and kinship networks, created new class alignments, and altered rural power structures.
Thus, land—once a source of livelihood and identity—has become a commodity of capital accumulation, symbolizing the ongoing transformation of Indian society.